Ask HN: What are the technical justifications for keeping .DS_Store?
22 by kaptain | 0 comments on Daily News.
I was hoping that with macos 11 we would see the deprecation of .DS_Store. I'm not running the beta so perhaps it is, but what has surprised me is its sustained longevity. What are the technical reasons for keeping .DS_Store? It is essentially a application-specific (i.e. Mac Finder) solution that pollutes the data store. Off the top of my head I can think of a number of other solutions to store directory metadata: a Finder-specific database mapping values to directory paths, resource forks (ala OS 9), etc.
22 by kaptain | 0 comments on Daily News.
I was hoping that with macos 11 we would see the deprecation of .DS_Store. I'm not running the beta so perhaps it is, but what has surprised me is its sustained longevity. What are the technical reasons for keeping .DS_Store? It is essentially a application-specific (i.e. Mac Finder) solution that pollutes the data store. Off the top of my head I can think of a number of other solutions to store directory metadata: a Finder-specific database mapping values to directory paths, resource forks (ala OS 9), etc.
New top story on Daily News: Ask HN: What are the technical justifications for keeping .DS_Store?
![New top story on Daily News: Ask HN: What are the technical justifications for keeping .DS_Store?]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
June 25, 2020
Rating:
